Abstract:
With each week’s news coverage of late, it seems we are in a ‘race against time before the ‘next big one’ hits, be it a natural disaster or drastic political and policy swings due to increasing polarization, rising conservatism and other challenges across the globe. The practice and scholarship of planning also is intimately connected to its own race with time – both in planning for the future, based on knowns and unknowns, and also sometimes against what time has wrought, righting the wrongs of past acts of history.
Publication date:
August 8, 2018
Publication type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Trapenberg Frick, K., Myers, D., Inch, A., Dorries, H., Thomas, J. M., Lung-Amam, W. S., Sandoval, G. F., Foss, A. W., & Trapenberg Frick, K. (2018). Strengthening Planning’s Effectiveness in a Hyper-Polarized World/Responding to the Conservative Common Sense of Opposition to Planning and Development in England/The Limits to Negotiation and the Promise of Refusal/Planning Contexts in a Hyper-Polarized World/A Right to Sanctuary: Supporting Immigrant Communities in an Era of Extreme Precarity/Planning and Climate Change: Opportunities and Challenges in a Politically Contested Environment/Speaking with the Middle 40% to Bridge the Political Divide for Mutual Gains in Planning Agreements. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(4), 581–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1507884